4.0 Article

Effect of spatial averaging on the amplitude ring ratio in multifocal electroretinography

期刊

DOCUMENTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA
卷 144, 期 1, 页码 41-52

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10633-021-09850-y

关键词

Multifocal ERG; Hydroxychloroquine; Maculopathy; Ring ratios

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of spatial averaging on mfERG amplitude ring ratios used for HCQ toxicity screening was evaluated in this study. The use of spatial averaging significantly affected the P1 amplitudes and ring ratios, with a correlation to the magnitude of the amplitudes and ratios. The study suggests that spatial averaging should be avoided when analyzing mfERG results for HCQ screening.
Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of spatial averaging on the multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) amplitude ring ratios used in screening for hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) toxicity. Methods This was a retrospective review of the records of patients screened for HCQ retinopathy at the USF Eye Institute (University of South Florida) during the period of 2015-2020. Patients were tested binocularly with Diagnosys mfERG system (Diagnosys LLC, Lowell, MA). Only the records of patients referred internally were used. The effects of the lowest level (level 1, or 8%) of spatial averaging on the P1 amplitude ring ratios used for screening of HCQ maculopathy: R1/R2, R2/R5, R5/R3 and R5/R4, were evaluated. Results The records of 40 patients (4 males, 36 females) aged 54.4 +/- 14.1 years were selected for analysis. The use of spatial averaging had a significant effect on P1 amplitudes, and on the ring ratios and this effect was correlated with the magnitude of the amplitudes and the ratios. Spatial averaging diminished P1 amplitude significantly in ring 1 (p < 0.0001) and increased it slightly in ring 4 (p < 0.05), while it had no effect on the amplitude of the other three rings. Although as a group spatial averaging had a moderate effect on the R1/R2 ratio (similar to -15%), on an individual basis the range was wide, from -36 to 43%. The effect on the other ring ratios was similar: The average group effect was similar to -5%, similar to -3.4% and similar to -4% for R2/R5, R5/R3 and R5/R4 ratios, but individual effects ranged from 0.18% to -27.3%, 0.9% to -14.2% and 0.9% to -26.2%, respectively. Conclusions For all ring ratios used in this analysis, spatial averaging has a substantial effect on the ring ratio, which could affect the interpretation of the results. Therefore, use of spatial averaging should be avoided when analyzing mfERG results for HCQ screening.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据