4.7 Article

Measuring circular vection speed in a virtual reality headset*

期刊

DISPLAYS
卷 69, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.displa.2021.102049

关键词

Vection measurement; Circular vection; VR headset; Vection speed

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the relationship between vection speed and display speed is important for accurate self-motion experiences. In this research, a virtual optokinetic drum was used to induce circular vection at different speeds, with results showing that participants perceive self-motion at faster speeds than intended. It is recommended to use indices such as the circular knob to better understand the relationship between graphic speed and vection speed.
Understanding the relationship between vection speed and display speed is important to help ensure accurate self-motion experiences in a variety of applications. In the present research, a virtual optokinetic drum was used to induce circular vection at three distinct constant velocities and a method for measuring circular vection speed was developed and examined. In Experiment 1, vection strength was measured using a traditional magnitude estimation rating technique. An optokinetic drum presented on a virtual reality (VR) headset rotated in the yaw axis at slow, medium, and fast speeds. Magnitude estimation ratings were greatest during the fast condition in Experiment 1, replicating previous findings and validating the use of the virtual optokinetic drum in a VR headset. In Experiment 2, participants spun a circular knob in a clockwise or counter-clockwise direction to index their vection speed, direction and duration. The speed at which participants spun the knob increased with drum speed. Vection speed was much faster than the optokinetic drum's speed, demonstrating that participants may perceive self-motion at faster speeds than intended. It is recommended that indices of vection speed such as the circular knob be used to better understand the relationship between graphic speed and vection speed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据