4.4 Article

Impact of marriage on physical activity behavior in women with multiple sclerosis

期刊

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
卷 44, 期 20, 页码 5941-5949

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1953622

关键词

Multiple sclerosis; women; physical activity; marriage; qualitative

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study highlights the significance of support and perceived support from spouses for women with MS in adopting and continuing physical activity. Regardless of the form, support was highly valued and found to impact women's motivation and prior PA. Women with MS could benefit from understanding and encouraging the various supporting roles spouses play in their decisions to be physically active.
Purpose Adopting and continuing physical activity (PA) is critical for the management of multiple sclerosis (MS). The role that spouses or partners play in the adoption and continuation of PA in women with MS has yet to be explored. Methods Nine women with MS and their respective spouses volunteered for in-depth, semi-structured interviews that lasted approximately an hour. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed thematically. Spouse interview data were used to contextualize and provide a richer understanding of themes from women with MS. Results Three themes were constructed from analysis of the interview data with women with MS: support, motivation to perform PA, and PA prior to MS. Support was most discussed and took the form joining in PA, supporting PA accomplishments or information sharing, assisting with PA, and encouraging separate PA. Motivation to perform PA and prior PA also were impacted by the women's spouses and their behaviors. Conclusions This study points to the importance of support and perception of support by spouses for women with MS. Support was highly valued regardless of the form that it took. Women with MS could benefit from understanding and encouraging the various supporting roles spouses play in the decisions women with MS make to be physically active.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据