4.4 Review

Diagnosing and Monitoring Celiac Patients with Selective IgA Deficiency: Still an Open Issue

期刊

DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES
卷 66, 期 10, 页码 3234-3241

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-021-07204-x

关键词

Celiac disease; Diagnosis; ESPGHAN guidelines; Monitoring; Selective IgA deficiency

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The association between celiac disease (CD) and selective immunoglobulin A deficiency (SIgAD) has been known for over fifty years, but diagnosing and monitoring patients with both conditions remain challenging. The 2012 ESPGHAN guidelines provided criteria for diagnosing CD in SIgAD patients, but issues such as selecting patients for specific IgG antibody testing and choosing reliable tests for diagnosis and follow-up still need to be addressed.
Although, the association between celiac disease (CD) and selective immunoglobulin A deficiency (SIgAD) has been known for more than fifty years, the procedures for diagnosing and monitoring patients with both conditions are still far from definitive. When serological markers were introduced as pre-bioptic investigations, it was immediately clear that searching for specific IgA antibodies without checking total serum IgA could lead to a failure in diagnosing IgA-deficient CD patients, while specific IgG antibodies could be useful as additional tests, because they are frequently found in the serum of affected patients. Nonetheless, until recently the diagnosis of CD in IgA-deficient patients was based on the few, fragmentary and often contradictory data available in literature. The introduction of the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) guidelines in 2012 provided the current criteria for diagnosing CD in IgA-deficient patients, although some issues remained open, such as the selection of patients who should undergo specific IgG antibody testing and the choice of the most reliable IgG-based test for both diagnosis and follow-up. A real-life study recently assessed the impact of the 2012 ESPGHAN guidelines in diagnosing and monitoring CD in SIgAD patients, highlighting several pitfalls that can lead to operational uncertainties and difficulties in patient management. In the present report, the evolution of diagnostic tools and criteria for CD in SIgAD patients has been critically assessed, both strengths and open issues have been highlighted, and future perspectives for improving the current diagnostic protocols have been suggested.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据