4.7 Article

The homeobox gene TGIF1 is required for chicken ovarian cortical development and generation of the juxtacortical medulla

期刊

DEVELOPMENT
卷 148, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/dev.199646

关键词

TGIF1; Ovarian cortex; Juxtacortical medulla; Gonadal development; Sex determination; Chicken embryo

资金

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) [200100709]
  2. Monash University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reveals the essential role of the TGIF1 gene in ovarian development in chicken embryos, particularly in the formation of the ovarian cortex and juxtacortical medulla. TGIF1 is necessary but not sufficient for proper ovarian development, and it is identified as the first regulator of juxtacortical medulla development.
During early embryogenesis in amniotic vertebrates, the gonads differentiate into either ovaries or testes. The first cell lineage to differentiate gives rise to the supporting cells: Sertoli cells in males and pre-granulosa cells in females. These key cell types direct the differentiation of the other cell types in the gonad, including steroidogenic cells. The gonadal surface epithelium and the interstitial cell populations are less well studied, and little is known about their sexual differentiation programs. Here, we show the requirement of the homeobox transcription factor gene TGIF1 for ovarian development in the chicken embryo. TGIF1 is expressed in the two principal ovarian somatic cell populations: the cortex and the pre-granulosa cells of the medulla. TGIF1 expression is associated with an ovarian phenotype in estrogen-mediated sex reversal experiments. Targeted misexpression and gene knockdown indicate that TGIF1 is required, but not sufficient, for proper ovarian cortex formation. In addition, TGIF1 is identified as the first known regulator of juxtacortical medulla development. These findings provide new insights into chicken ovarian differentiation and development, specifically cortical and juxtacortical medulla formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据