4.7 Article

Quantifying the influence of divalent cations mass transport on critical flux and organic fouling mechanism of forward osmosis membrane

期刊

DESALINATION
卷 512, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2021.115146

关键词

Threshold flux; Divalent cations; Mass transport; Fouling mechanism; Forward osmosis

资金

  1. Korea Environment Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI) through Industrial Facilities & Infrastructure Research Program - Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE) [1485016165]
  2. GIST Research Institute (GRI) - GIST

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals the important impact of divalent cations on the formation of organic fouling on FO membranes, with flux below the critical value aiding in reducing the extent of fouling on the membrane.
Understanding the insightful impact of divalent cations mass transport on the complex organic fouling of forward osmosis (FO) membrane is vital when seawater/brine is utilized in a FO hybrid process. Our works deeply focused on quantifying the influence of divalent cations on not only critical flux but also the organic fouling mechanism. The presence of divalent cations in aqueous solutions caused a decrease in critical flux values. The fouling mechanism is mainly governed by intermolecular and ion-mediated interactions. The findings suggested the interaction of divalent cations with organic matters close to the membrane surface is more noticeable than that in the feed solution. These interactions combined with an operation at the flux >= 30 LMH led to the formation of a compact and cohesive cake layer (4.8-9.1 mu m) where the great divalent cations were deposited on membrane surface after 30 h operation (Ca2+: 162.13-256.72 g/m2, Mg2+: 182.60-374.38 g/m2). In contrast, 21 LMH below critical value exhibited minor fouling with a very thin cake layer (0.5 mu m) and minimized deposited divalent cations (Ca2+: 79.47 g/m2, Mg2+: 46.65 g/m2). Overall, the extended operation of 30 h suggested 16-21 LMH were threshold values for FO fouling control.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据