4.5 Article

Pityriasis rubra pilaris treatment options: A retrospective case series from a tertiary hospital

期刊

DERMATOLOGIC THERAPY
卷 34, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dth.15128

关键词

erythroderma; pharmacology; pityriasis rubra pilaris; therapy-biology; therapy-systemic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP) is a rare chronic inflammatory skin condition with limited treatment options. This study retrospectively analyzed data from 13 PRP patients in Australia from 2010 to 2019. Acitretin was the most commonly used systemic agent but resulted in adverse events in some cases. Complete clearance of PRP was achieved in 5 cases without biologic agents, and 2 cases showed marked improvement with biologic agents.
Pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP) is a group of uncommon chronic inflammatory skin conditions with unclear pathophysiology and etiology. To date there is limited published literature and no clinical guidelines for the management of PRP. Infliximab, alone or in combination, is the most widely published successful treatment for adults and etanercept for pediatric populations. We present a case series of patients diagnosed with PRP. Retrospective data were collected from a tertiary Australian dermatology department between January 2010 and December 2019 on patients with PRP. Electronic medical records and pathology database were searched. A total of 13 patients were included. Twelve of the 13 patients used topical agents and three patients attempted narrow-band ultraviolet B phototherapy. All patients received acitretin as first line systemic agent with the dose varying from 10 to 50 mg daily. Six patients treated with acitretin reported adverse events, requiring dose reduction or cessation. Of the nine patients who did not receive a biologic agent, complete clearance of PRP was achieved in five cases. At least one biologic agent was used in four cases with two experiencing a marked improvement. Overall, complete clearance was achieved in six patients. PRP continues to be a challenge to treat with many treatment options used with variable efficacy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据