4.4 Article

The Suceava oak chronology: A new 804 years long tree-ring chronology bridging the gap between central and south Europe

期刊

DENDROCHRONOLOGIA
卷 68, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.dendro.2021.125856

关键词

Eastern Europe; Suceava chronology; Sapwood; Teleconnection

资金

  1. EEA Financial Mechanism [18SEE/2014]
  2. EU [2SOFT/1.2/13]
  3. National Science Center, Poland [2016/22/A/HS3/00285]
  4. Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research and Innovation [PN-II-RU-TE-20144-0855]
  5. Romanian Ministry of Research and Innovation in Core Program for Forestry - BIOSERV [PN 19070502]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study highlighted the importance of creating a reference chronology in eastern European regions by combining living and historical chronologies, presenting the Suceava oak chronology as the first long chronology covering the 1216-2019 period. The strong teleconnection with south European chronologies and the link with Romania and northern Turkey chronologies are of particular importance for dating undated wood and reconstructing climate in the region.
Although the importance of centuries-long tree ring width oak chronologies in dating wood, eastern European regions are still lacking a reference chronology. To fill this geographical gap, we combined living and historical chronologies from the Moldova region, including part of Romania and the Republic of Moldova. Here we present the Suceava oak chronology as the first 804 years long chronology continuously covering the 1216-2019 period. Our analyses further revealed the strong teleconnection of the Suceava oak chronology with south European ones. The link between Romania and northern Turkey chronologies is of particular importance in the context of the high abundance of undated subfossil and archaeological/historical oak wood in eastern Europe and intense wood trades with central Europe in XV-XVII centuries. The availability of the Suceava oak chronology will provide a good base for precise dating and climatic reconstructions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据