4.3 Review

Definitions of acute renal dysfunction: an evolving clinical and biomarker paradigm

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE
卷 27, 期 6, 页码 553-559

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000886

关键词

acute kidney injury; biomarkers; definition; sub-phenotypes; sub-types

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The review highlights limitations in the current definition and classification of acure kidney injury (AKI) and presents recent advances in understanding its pathophysiology and epidemiology, which offer opportunities for personalized management and refinement of existing criteria. The identification of different sub-phenotypes of AKI based on genetic, molecular, cellular, and functional pathophysiological changes following potential nephrotoxic exposures is possible with new technologies.
Purpose of review The current definition and classification of acute kidney injury (AKI) has limitations and shortcomings, which impact clinical management. The aim of this review is to highlight recent advances in our understanding of the pathophysiology and epidemiology of AKI, which impacts management and offers opportunities. Recent findings Kidney damage varies according to the type of primary insult, secondary effects and mitigating responses and leads to distinct molecular, cellular and functional changes. Different sub-types of AKI with varying clinical phenotypes, recovery patterns and responses to therapeutic interventions have been identified. New tools to identify and characterize these AKI sub-types are available with the potential opportunity for individualized timely aetiology-based management of AKI. The identification of different sub-phenotypes of AKI based on genetic, molecular, cellular and functional pathophysiological changes following potential nephrotoxic exposures is possible with new technologies. This offers opportunities for personalized management of AKI and supports the call for a refinement of the existing AKI criteria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据