4.3 Article

Lipid management across Europe in the real-world setting: a rapid evidence review

期刊

CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION
卷 37, 期 12, 页码 2049-2059

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1973396

关键词

Dyslipidemia; cardiovascular disease; lipid management; literature review; low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; real-world evidence

资金

  1. Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A recent review of real-world studies in Europe found that LDL-C control is suboptimal in high/very high risk patients with hypercholesterolemia/dyslipidemia, and the utilization of available LLT strategies, particularly combination therapy, is inadequate, resulting in insufficient management of cardiovascular risk.
Objective To provide a contemporary overview of recent real-world lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) practices and outcomes in patients with hypercholesterolemia/dyslipidemia at high/very high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in Europe. Methods A structured literature review of recent (July 2015-July 2020) real-world studies reporting lipid management and outcomes was conducted using a rapid evidence synthesis. Outcomes included patient characteristics, LLT treatment practices, adherence and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal attainment. Results Fifty-three real-world observational studies in high/very high risk patients were selected after screening 5664 records (n = 50 national [sample size range 38-237,279] and n = 3 multinational studies [sample size range 6648-8456]). Mean age ranged from 33 to 77 years; hypertension, diabetes and obesity were commonly reported comorbidities. Statins were the most common LLT; patients without familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) mostly received high or moderate intensity statins/LLT, while patients with FH mostly received high intensity statins/LLT. The proportion of patients receiving ezetimibe was low overall (ezetimibe + statin use in those with and without familial hypercholesterolemia [FH] range 5%-59% and 1%-22%, respectively). Overall, the use of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 inhibitor (PCSK9i) therapy was limited. Adherence to LLT therapies was defined variably and ranged from 46%-92%. LDL-C goal attainment was suboptimal, irrespective of LLT (overall range in goal attainment with oral LLT was 2%-73% [FH: 2%-23%] and with PCSK9i was 20%-65%). Conclusions LDL-C control is suboptimal and the available LLT armamentarium, most importantly combination therapy, is being underutilized in high/very high risk patients leading to inadequate management of cardiovascular risk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据