4.8 Article

Rare long-range cortical connections enhance human information processing

期刊

CURRENT BIOLOGY
卷 31, 期 20, 页码 4436-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.07.064

关键词

-

资金

  1. Spanish national research project [PID2019-105772GB-I00 MCIU AEI]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (MCIU), State Research Agency (AEI)
  3. HBP SGA3 Human Brain Project Specific grant agreement 3 [945539]
  4. EU [001-P-001682, 201725.33]
  5. Catalan Agency for Management of University and Research Grants (AGAUR) [101017716]
  6. Corticity, FLAG-ERA JTC 2017 [PCI2018-092891]
  7. Center for Music in the Brain - Danish National Research Foundation [DNRF117]
  8. Pettit Foundation
  9. Carlsberg Foundation
  10. Fundacio La Marato TV3

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The topological features of connectivity, such as long-range exceptions and turbulence, play a crucial role in improving information processing for efficient cortical function.
What are the key topological features of connectivity critically relevant for generating the dynamics underlying efficient cortical function? A candidate feature that has recently emerged is that the connectivity of the mammalian cortex follows an exponential distance rule, which includes a small proportion of long-range high-weight anatomical exceptions to this rule. Whole-brain modeling of large-scale human neuroimaging data in 1,003 participants offers the unique opportunity to create two models, with and without long-range exceptions, and explicitly study their functional consequences. We found that rare long-range exceptions are crucial for significantly improving information processing. Furthermore, modeling in a simplified ring architecture shows that this improvement is greatly enhanced by the turbulent regime found in empirical neuroimaging data. Overall, the results provide strong empirical evidence for the immense functional benefits of long-range exceptions combined with turbulence for information processing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据