4.7 Review

Improving the safety and security of fruits and vegetables during COVID-19 pandemic with postharvest handling

期刊

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION
卷 62, 期 32, 页码 8855-8865

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2021.1935703

关键词

Agricultural policies; consumers' demand; food crisis; horticultural production; international trade; postharvest losses

资金

  1. Advantage Innovation Team Project of Jiangxi Province [20181BCB24005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused negative impacts on the global economy, particularly affecting horticultural production and exacerbating food supply shocks. Scientific research has confirmed that reducing postharvest losses can help alleviate food supply pressure and reduce strain on natural resources.
The COVID-19 pandemic has damaged the world's economy during 2020-2021, reduced the purchasing power of households, partially restricted international movements and trade (including food products) and damaged horticultural production. This resulted in uncertainty in the food business and caused food supply shocks. According to some scientists, business people, and politicians, this situation is a forerunner and warning for humanity to change its lifestyle by focusing on sustainable measures to prevent natural ecosystems damage. In line with this, the present review article focused on the significant impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on horticultural production and some prevention measures. It has been scientifically confirmed that the postharvest losses of fruits and vegetables reach around 10-15% in developed countries and about 20-40% in developing countries, higher in some specific crops. It is believed that reducing these losses can help the world fight food supply shocks during the COVID-19 pandemic and customary conditions to reduce the pressure on natural resources. Therefore, the present paper aimed to highlight some critical handling practices against food supply shocks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据