4.7 Review

An overview of different homogenizers, their working mechanisms and impact on processing of fruits and vegetables

期刊

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION
卷 63, 期 14, 页码 2004-2017

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2021.1969890

关键词

Antioxidant properties; mechanical homogenizers; physicochemical properties; pressure homogenizers; ultrasonic homogenizers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fruits and vegetables are important foods rich in antioxidants, vitamins and minerals that help boost immunity against chronic diseases. Homogenizers, including mechanical homogenizers, pressure homogenizers and ultrasonic homogenizers, are commonly used in the processing of fruits and vegetables. Among them, high-pressure homogenizers have been widely used and reported due to their ability to improve shelf-life and physicochemical properties of the product.
Fruits and vegetables (F&V) are the second highest recommended foods, rich in antioxidants, vitamins and minerals, vital for building immunity against chronic diseases. F&V processing involves particle size reduction, for which different types of homogenizers, categorized as mechanical homogenizers, pressure homogenizers and ultrasonic homogenizers are used. The review discusses different types of homogenizers, their working mechanism, and application in F&V processing. Among mechanical homogenizers, knife mills are used for primary size reduction, ball mills for the micronization of dried F&V and rotor-stator homogenizers for emulsification. Use of the ultrasonic homogenizer is limited to extraction of bioactive compounds or as a pre-treatment for dehydration of F&V. High-pressure homogenizers are most widely used and reported due to the synergistic effect of homogenization and temperature increase, resulting in longer shelf-life and better physicochemical properties of the product. Additionally, the review also explains the effect of homogenization on the physicochemical, sensory and nutraceutical properties of the product.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据