4.8 Review

Metal-Organic Frameworks in Italy: From synthesis and advanced characterization to theoretical modeling and applications

期刊

COORDINATION CHEMISTRY REVIEWS
卷 437, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2021.213861

关键词

Metal-Organic Frameworks; Italy; Thiazole; Pyrazole; Tetrazole; Phosphonate; Formate; Cerium; Theoretical calculations; Advanced characterization; Heterogeneous catalysis; Gas storage; Gas separation; Luminescence; Magnetism

资金

  1. FIRB2017 project, Dipartimenti di Eccel-lenza -2018-2022, Universita di Perugia
  2. AMIS project, Dipartimenti di Eccel-lenza -2018-2022, Universita di Perugia
  3. Italian MIUR through the PRIN 2017 project MULTI-e Multielectron transfer for the conversion of small molecules: an enabling technology for the chemical use of renewable energy [20179337R7]
  4. Italian MIUR through the TRAINER project Catalysts for Transition to Renewable Energy Future [ANR-17-MPGA-0017]
  5. PRACE initiative [2013081680]
  6. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-17-MPGA-0017] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Italian research teams in the field of Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) will showcase their research results at the ICCC2022 conference, covering synthesis, characterization, theoretical investigations, and applications.
As a celebration of the 44th International Conference on Coordination Chemistry (ICCC2022) that will take place in Italy, the Italian groups working in the research field of Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) have decided to gather together and collect the results they have obtained in this area over the past 15 years. A survey that starts from the synthesis of novel heterocyclic linkers and the related MOFs and moves through advanced characterization techniques, theoretical investigations and assorted applications in the fields of gas storage and separation, heterogeneous catalysis, magnetism and sensing. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据