4.3 Article

Standardizing abortion research outcomes (STAR): Results from an international consensus development study

期刊

CONTRACEPTION
卷 104, 期 5, 页码 484-491

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.07.004

关键词

Surgical abortion; Medical abortion; Clinical trials; Core outcomes

资金

  1. WHO's UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By using consensus methods, a core outcome set for future abortion research has been developed, consisting of 15 outcomes that can standardize research, decrease trial heterogeneity, and enhance the quality of systematic reviews and clinical guidelines. Researchers are encouraged to select, collect, and report these core outcomes in future abortion trials, while journal editors should promote the reporting of core outcome sets.
Objective: To develop a minimum data set, known as a core outcome set, for future abortion randomized controlled trials. Study design: We extracted outcomes from quantitative and qualitative systematic reviews of abortion studies to assess using a modified Delphi method. Via email, we invited researchers, clinicians, patients, and healthcare organization representatives with expertise in abortion to rate the importance of the outcomes on a 9-point Likert scale. After 2 rounds, we used descriptive analyses to determine which outcomes met the predefined consensus criteria. We finalized the core outcome set during a series of consensus development meetings. Results: We entered 42 outcomes, organized in 15 domains, into the Delphi survey. Two-hundred eighteen of 251 invitees (87%) provided responses (203 complete responses) for round 1 and 118 of 218 (42%) completed round2. Sixteen experts participated in the development meetings. The final outcome set includes 15 outcomes: 10 outcomes apply to all abortion trials (successful abortion, ongoing pregnancy, death, hemorrhage, uterine infection, hospitalization, surgical intervention, pain, gastrointestinal symptoms, and patients' experience of abortion); 2 outcomes apply to only surgical abortion trials (uterine perforation and cervical injury), one applies only to medical abortion trials (uterine rupture); and 2 apply to trials evaluating abortions with anesthesia (over-sedation/respiratory depression and local anesthetic systemic toxicity). Conclusion: Using robust consensus science methods we have developed a core outcome set for future abortion research. Implications: Standardized outcomes in abortion research could decrease heterogeneity among trials and improve the quality of systematic reviews and clinical guidelines. Researchers should select, collect, and report these core outcomes in future abortion trials. Journal editors should advocate for core outcome set reporting. (c) 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据