4.7 Article

Evaluation of pore size distribution and permeability reduction behavior in pervious concrete

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 290, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123228

关键词

Pervious concrete; Clogging sand size; Characteristic pore size; Permeability; Clogging; Porosity; Pore size distribution

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51808326]
  2. Faculty Start-up Grant of China University of Mining and Technology [102520282]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the pore size distributions and permeability reduction behavior of pervious concrete through laboratory tests. The results showed that while thickness has a negligible effect on permeability, it has a significant impact on clogging behavior.
Pervious concrete is an environmentally friendly material that improves water permeability, skid resistance, and sound absorption characteristics. However, due to a large number of pores and the absorption capacity, pervious concrete faces the problem of clogging caused by dust particles and solid contaminants entering the internal pores. In this study, both pore size distributions (PSD) of the pervious concrete and permeability reduction behavior are studied by laboratory tests. The extent of permeability reduction is addressed by designing the penetration test for 21 groups of pervious concrete mixes with varying aggregate gradations and specimen thickness. The PSD is determined by the two-dimensional (2D) sliced image scanned by the Computed Tomography (CT). An approach to represent the characteristic pore size of pervious concrete is proposed and verified. Results showed that: the effect of thickness on permeability is negligible while on clogging behavior is significant. The ratio between the clogging sand sizes and the characteristic pore size is an important parameter that affects the clogging behavior and can be used to predict the anti-clogging performance. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据