4.7 Article

Machine learning prediction of carbonation depth in recycled aggregate concrete incorporating SCMs

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 287, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123027

关键词

Machine learning; Model; Recycled aggregate concrete; Carbonation; Gradient boosting; Regression trees; Supplementary cementitious materials

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A GBRT model is proposed to determine the carbonation depth of recycled aggregate concrete with different mineral additions, showing that machine learning outperformed mathematical models and can provide insight into concrete resistance to carbonation and predict other features of concrete with diverse recycled materials.
While recycled aggregates and supplementary cementitious materials have often been hailed for enhanc-ing concrete sustainability, their effects on the resistance of concrete to carbonation has been controver-sial. Thus, deploying robust machine learning tools to overcome the lack of understanding of the implications of incorporating such sustainable materials is of paramount importance. Accordingly, this study proposes a gradient boosting regression tree (GBRT) model to determine the carbonation depth of recycled aggregate concrete incorporating different mineral additions, including metakaolin, blast fur-nace slag, silica fume, and fly ash. For this purpose, a database comprising 713 pertinent experimental data records was retrieved from peer-reviewed publications and used for model development and test-ing. Furthermore, predictions of the GBRT model were compared with calculations of available mathe-matical formulations to determine the carbonation depth in concrete. The results demonstrate that the machine learning methodology outperformed all the mathematical models considered in this study. The GBRT proved to be a robust tool that could be used to provide an insight into the resistance of con-crete to carbonation and could be extended to predicting other features of concrete incorporating diverse recycled materials. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据