4.6 Article

Transcending capitalism growth strategies for biodiversity conservation

期刊

CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
卷 36, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13821

关键词

conservation strategy; degrowth; economic growth; environmental degradation; Global Biodiversity Framework; nature protection; socioeconomic metabolism; sustainable development; crecimiento economico; decrecimiento; degradacion ambiental; desarrollo sustentable; estrategia de conservacion; metabolismo socioeconomico; Marco de Trabajo Mundial de la Diversidad Biologica; proteccion de la naturaleza

资金

  1. [RTI2018-094844B-C31]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The unlimited economic growth associated with capitalism has resulted in significant environmental destruction and biodiversity loss, highlighting the need to address the contradictions between economic growth and biodiversity conservation. Global agendas related to sustainable development have been established since the 1970s, but only in the early 2000s did biodiversity loss become a major focus for environmental researchers. The current global biodiversity agendas, however, do not fully acknowledge the negative impacts of growth-oriented strategies on biodiversity, emphasizing the economic value of biodiversity over its intrinsic importance for ecosystems and human well-being.
The unlimited economic growth that fuels capitalism's metabolism has profoundly transformed a large portion of Earth. The resulting environmental destruction has led to an unprecedented rate of biodiversity loss. Following large-scale losses of habitats and species, it was recognized that biodiversity is crucial to maintaining functional ecosystems. We sought to continue the debate on the contradictions between economic growth and biodiversity in the conservation science literature and thus invite scholars to engage in reversing the biodiversity crisis through acknowledging the impacts of economic growth. In the 1970s, a global agenda was set to develop different milestones related to sustainable development, including green-blue economic growth, which despite not specifically addressing biodiversity reinforced the idea that economic development based on profit is compatible with the planet's ecology. Only after biodiversity loss captured the attention of environmental sciences researchers in the early 2000s was a global biodiversity agenda implemented. The agenda highlights biodiversity conservation as a major international challenge and recognizes that the main drivers of biodiversity loss derive from economic activities. The post-2000 biodiversity agendas, including the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the post-2020 Convention on Biological Diversity Global Strategy Framework, do not consider the negative impacts of growth-oriented strategies on biodiversity. As a result, global biodiversity conservation priorities are governed by the economic value of biodiversity and its assumed contribution to people's welfare. A large body of empirical evidence shows that unlimited economic growth is the main driver of biodiversity loss in the Anthropocene; thus, we strongly argue for sustainable degrowth and a fundamental shift in societal values. An equitable downscaling of the physical economy can improve ecological conditions, thus reducing biodiversity loss and consequently enhancing human well-being.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据