4.4 Article

On the ridge estimation of the Conway-Maxwell Poisson regression model with multicollinearity: Methods and applications

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cpe.6477

关键词

COMP; COMPRR; multicollinearity; over dispersion; ridge parameter

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Conway-Maxwell Poisson (COMP) model is a flexible count data model that addresses over and under dispersion. Ridge regression estimators are proposed to handle multicollinearity in the COMP regression model, with mean squared error (MSE) used as the performance evaluation criteria. The evaluation through simulation studies and real applications shows the superiority of the proposed estimator in dealing with multicollinearity.
In data analysis, count data modeling contributing a significant role. The Conway-Maxwell Poisson (COMP) is one of the flexible count data models to deal over and under dispersion. In the COMP regression model, when the explanatory variables are correlated, then the maximum likelihood estimator does not give efficient results due to the large standard error (SE) of the estimates. To overcome the effect of multicollinearity, we have proposed some ridge regression estimators in the COMP regression model by introducing dispersion parameter in the context of overdispersion, equidispersion, and underdispersion. The Iterative reweighted least method is used for the estimation of ridge regression coefficients in the COMP regression model. To evaluate the performance of the proposed estimators, we use mean squared error (MSE) as the performance evaluation criteria. Theoretical comparison of the proposed estimators with the competitor estimators is made and conditions of efficiency have been derived. The proposed estimator is evaluated with the help of a simulation study and two real applications. The results of the simulation study and real applications show the superiority of the proposed estimator because the proposed estimator produces smaller MSE and SEs of the COMP regression estimates with multicollinearity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据