4.7 Article

CovidXrayNet: Optimizing data augmentation and CNN hyperparameters for improved COVID-19 detection from CXR

期刊

COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 133, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104375

关键词

Chest X-Ray; Convolutional neural network; COVID-19; Data augmentation; Hyperparameters

资金

  1. Google Cloud COVID-19 research credits program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the use of chest X-rays and artificial intelligence for diagnosing COVID-19, optimizing the model to improve accuracy. The proposed CovidXrayNet model achieves a state-of-the-art accuracy of 95.82% on the COVIDx dataset in the three-class classification task.
To mitigate the spread of the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, it is crucial to have an effective screening of infected patients to be isolated and treated. Chest X-Ray (CXR) radiological imaging coupled with Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications, in particular Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), can speed the COVID-19 diagnostic process. In this paper, we optimize the data augmentation and the CNN hyperparameters for detecting COVID-19 from CXRs in terms of validation accuracy. This optimization increases the accuracy of the popular CNN architectures such as the Visual Geometry Group network (VGG-19) and the Residual Neural Network (ResNet-50), by 11.93% and 4.97%, respectively. We then proposed CovidXrayNet model that is based on EfficientNet-B0 and our optimization results. We evaluated CovidXrayNet on two datasets, including our generated balanced COVIDcxr dataset (960 CXRs) and the benchmark COVIDx dataset (15,496 CXRs). With only 30 epochs of training, CovidXrayNet achieves state-of-the-art accuracy of 95.82% on the COVIDx dataset in the three-class classification task (COVID-19, normal or pneumonia). The CovidXRayNet model, the COVIDcxr dataset, and several optimization experiments are publicly available at https://github.com /MaramMonshi/CovidXrayNet.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据