4.5 Article

Data integrity auditing for secure cloud storage using user behavior prediction

期刊

COMPUTERS & SECURITY
卷 105, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.cose.2021.102245

关键词

Data integrity; Cloud storage; User behavior prediction; Valid auditing; Data sharing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper focuses on the core security issue of data integrity in cloud storage, addressing the resource waste caused by invalid auditing through the introduction of user behavior prediction algorithms and proposing the concept of valid auditing. By formalizing a system model and security model, as well as developing a prototype implementation, it improves auditing efficiency and reduces invalid auditing.
Data integrity is a core security issue in reliable cloud storage that has received widespread attention. Data auditing protocols enable verifiers to efficiently check the integrity of out sourced data without downloading the data. A key research challenge associated with the design of existing data auditing protocols is the efficiency of the auditing process. Since existing protocols tend to auditing all cloud data, in fact, some data may have just been used or will be used soon, then auditing all these data is invalid, which is a waste of resources. In this paper, we attempt to address the waste of resources due to invalid auditing in cloud data integrity checking by introducing user behavior prediction algorithms,the first in such an approach, to the best of our knowledge. More specifically, we introduce the concept of valid auditing in data integrity verification based on the concept of valid auditing. We formalize a system model and a security model for this new concept. Then, using user behavior prediction algorithms, we give methods to improve auditing efficiency and reduce invalid auditing. Finally, we develop a prototype implementation of the protocol to validate the practicality of the scheme. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据