4.5 Article

An exact non-equilibrium extrapolation scheme for pressure and velocity boundary conditions with large gradients in the lattice Boltzmann method

期刊

COMPUTERS & FLUIDS
卷 231, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2021.105163

关键词

Lattice Boltzmann method; Non-equilibrium extrapolation; Pressure and velocity boundary conditions

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51836003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The proposed exact non-equilibrium extrapolation (eNEQ) scheme for velocity and pressure boundary conditions in the lattice Boltzmann method demonstrates second-order spatial accuracy for both parameters. By introducing well designed parameters to correct distribution functions, the scheme ensures accuracy in cases with large pressure or velocity gradient at the boundary, outperforming the conventional NEQ scheme. The eNEQ scheme retains the advantages of the original NEQ scheme while precisely implementing velocity and pressure boundary conditions.
In this work, an exact non-equilibrium extrapolation (eNEQ) scheme for velocity and pressure boundary conditions in the lattice Boltzmann method is proposed. Based on the non-equilibrium extrapolation (NEQ) scheme, well designed parameters are introduced to correct the distribution functions. Numerical results of velocity and pressure driven Poiseuille flows demonstrate that the present eNEQ scheme is of second-order spatial accuracy for both velocity and pressure boundary conditions. In addition, a series of other numerical simulation results show that in some cases with the large pressure or velocity gradient at the boundary, the eNEQ scheme can well ensure the accuracy of the calculation results, while the NEQ scheme performs struggle due to the adoption of the extrapolation scheme. On the basis of retaining the advantages of the original NEQ scheme, the present eNEQ scheme can be used to implement the velocity and pressure boundary conditions exactly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据