4.5 Article

CARE: A Collision-Aware Mobile Robot Navigation in Grid Environment using Improved Breadth First Search

期刊

COMPUTERS & ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
卷 94, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107327

关键词

Mobile robot; Navigation; Autonomous vehicle; Exploration; Breadth first search

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a collision-free low-complexity Mobile Robot navigation scheme, which utilizes Radio Frequency based Identification for localization, hybrid approach for path planning, and a predefined decision table for navigation. The performance of the algorithms is analyzed in grid-based environments of different sizes, showing effectiveness especially in obstacle-free environments.
In recent years, there is an increasing interest in designing autonomous vehicles such as Mobile Robots. However, one of the fundamental needs of Mobile Robots is a collision-free navigation with an optimal path from the source to the destination. In this paper, a collision-free low-complexity Mobile Robot navigation scheme called Collision Aware Mobile Robot navigation in Grid-Environment is designed. The proposed scheme uses the Radio Frequency based Identification method for Mobile Robot localization, the hybrid approach for the path planning, and a predefined decision table for the navigation. The algorithms are implemented in two stages, construction of virtual world and generation of optimal shortest path. The algorithms' performance is analyzed in grid-based environment of size 5x5, 20 x 20, 35x35, and 50 x 50 with four different cases. It is observed that for the environment with no obstacles, the robot explores fewer cells in finding the shortest path. However, the number of turning in the shortest path is always less in the environment with some obstacles than in the case of whole virtual world exploration. The performance results show the effectiveness of the proposed scheme for Mobile Robot navigation in the grid environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据