4.5 Article

Enhancing Whale Optimization Algorithm with Levy Flight for coverage optimization in wireless sensor networks

期刊

COMPUTERS & ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
卷 94, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107359

关键词

Coverage optimization; Whale Optimization algorithm; Levy Flights; K-Nearest Neighbor (centroid)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coverage optimization is crucial in WSN, and LWOA can significantly improve global search capacity and coverage efficiency.
Coverage Optimization is one of the most essential pre-requisites in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) which plays a significant and impactful role in the field of environmental monitoring, surveillance, socio-economic Cyber-networkings, etc. The Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA) is a swarm intelligence based Search-Algorithm while browsing for an optimal solution, but, it suffers from the poor & inconsistent exploration problem and that causes trapping of local optima in randomly deployed nodes that fail to guarantee network coverage. To resolve the issue, an innovative study has been researched which presents an embedded coverage optimization WSN and is based on Levy Flight mechanism with WOA (LWOA) .This updates the current search of location for positioning the sensors in the field. This mechanism can enhance and balance the exploration ability of WOA, which allows trapping of the local optima. This thichnically enhanced and updated proposal LWOA is validated by 25 benchmark optimization functions and is compared with existing Particle Swarm Optimization and WOA. From the experimental results, it can be construed and proved that the performance of Levy WOA (LWOA) has significantly improved the global search capacity and increase the efficiency of convergence, which immensely enhances the efficacy of coverage of nodes inturn amplifying the overall performance of the network. Finally, by using the K-Nearest Neighbour KNN(centroid) approach nearly 33% of nodes were optimized.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据