4.5 Article

Compound-eye imaging imitation-based whole-field flow measurement

期刊

COMPUTERS & ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
卷 92, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107141

关键词

Large-scale particle image velocimetry; Imaging measurement; Compound eye

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51979085]
  2. Guangdong Water Conservancy Science and Technology Innovation Project [2020-04]
  3. University-Level Research Fund Project of Nanjing Institute of Technology [ZKJ201907]
  4. Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper introduces an imaging measurement method that imitates the imaging computation mechanism in compound eyes, which can achieve real-world whole-field flow measurement in challenging conditions with a velocimetry error less than 5%.
Large-scale particle image velocimetry (LSPIV) has been increasingly applied in whole-field flow measurement for its non-contact operation mode. However, due to the complicated flow conditions and optical disturbances on the water-air interface, commonly-used imaging technologies are degenerated by the low visibility and image distortion. There are also increased challenges for control point calibration. This paper proposes an imaging measurement method that imitates the imaging computation mechanism in compound eyes. The method is independent of ground control points and can achieve flow measurement with natural patterns, which can solve the problem caused by the lack of visible tracers. Field evaluation results demonstrate that this is the first method to achieve real-world whole-field flow measurement in challenging conditions. Specifically, the velocimetry error is less than 5%, while ranging from 5% to 15% for other LSPIV systems. The method meets current hydrological standards and acquires flow data in wild rivers, performance that is realized with difficulty by other methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据