4.7 Article

Stress-based and robust topology optimization for thermoelastic multi-material periodic microstructures

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2021.113749

关键词

Homogenization; Metamaterial; Architected material; Additive manufacturing; Gradient alloys

资金

  1. NASA Center Innovation Fund, USA
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, USA [80NM0018D0004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A topology optimization framework is developed to synthesize high-strength spatially periodic metamaterials with unique thermoelastic properties, and stress and manufacturing uncertainty methods are used to achieve large reductions in stress while maintaining strength and thermal expansion properties.
To take advantage of multi-material additive manufacturing technology using mixtures of metal alloys, a topology optimization framework is developed to synthesize high-strength spatially periodic metamaterials possessing unique thermoelastic properties. A thermal and mechanical stress analysis formulation based on homogenization theory is developed and is used in a regional scaled aggregation stress constraint method. Since specific load cases are not always known beforehand, a method of worst-case stress minimization is also included to efficiently address load uncertainty. It is shown that the two stress-based techniques lead to thermal expansion properties that are highly sensitive to small changes in material distribution and composition. To resolve this issue, a uniform manufacturing uncertainty method is utilized which considers variations in both geometry and material mixture. Test cases of high stiffness, zero thermal expansion, and negative thermal expansion microstructures are generated, and the stress-based and manufacturing uncertainty methods are applied to demonstrate how the techniques alter the optimized designs. Large reductions in stress are achieved while maintaining robust strength and thermal expansion properties. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据