4.5 Article

Ortho_Sim_Loc: Essential protein prediction using orthology and priority-based similarity approach

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2021.107503

关键词

Classifier; Clustering; Sub-cellular localization; Orthologous groups; Protein-protein interaction; 3-sigma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Proteins are essential macro-molecules of living organism that are computed for essentiality by computational methods rather than biological experiments, saving time and effort. Different computational approaches successfully select essential proteins with different biological significances, outperforming experimental methods with higher false negative outcomes. The novel methodology Ortho_Sim_Loc predicts enriched functional set essential proteins by combining Orthology, Similarity, and Subcellular localization, demonstrating better performance compared to other existing computational approaches.
Proteins are the essential macro-molecules of living organism. But all proteins cannot be considered as essential in different relevant studies. Essentiality of a protein is thus computed by computation methods rather than biological experiments which in turn save both time and effort. Different computational approaches are already predicted to select essential proteins successfully with different biological significances by researchers. Most of the experimental approaches return higher false negative outcomes with respect to others. In order to retain the prediction accuracy level, a novel methodology Ortho_Sim_Lochas been proposed which is a combined approach of Orthology, Similarity (using clustering and priority based GO-Annotation) and Subcellular localization. Ortho_Sim_Loc can predict enriched functional set essential proteins. The predicted results are validated with other existing methods like different centrality measures, LIDC. The validation results exhibits better performance of Ortho Sim Loc in compare to other existing computational approaches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据