4.7 Article

A new method of stiffness prediction for periodic beam-like structures

期刊

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
卷 267, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113892

关键词

Periodic; Beam-like structure; Effective stiffness; Timoshenko; Boundary constraint

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [12002019, 11872090, 11672019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This method presents a new approach for predicting stiffness of periodic beam-like structures based on the selfequilibrium equation of the unit cell. The effective stiffness matrix of a periodic heterogeneous beam is explicitly formulated, and six normalization constraints are introduced to determine the unique solution of the selfequilibrium equation of the unit cell. A standard finite element formulation for calculating warping displacements is derived using the principle of the minimum potential energy.
This paper presents a new method for stiffness prediction of periodic beam-like structures based on the selfequilibrium equation of the unit cell. In this method, actual displacements of a composite beam are separated into homogenized displacements and warping displacements. The effective stiffness matrix of a periodic heterogeneous beam is explicitly formulated based on the energy equivalence or the internal force equivalence of the unit cell at both macroscopic and microscopic levels, and it follows that these two approaches are equivalent in essence. In addition, six normalization constraints to determine the unique solution of the selfequilibrium equation of the unit cell are introduced and well elaborated from physical interpretations. Furthermore, a standard finite element formulation for calculating the warping displacements is derived by using the principle of the minimum potential energy. This method can be easily implemented in commercial software Comsol. Finally, numerical comparisons with the results in literature validate the effectiveness and accuracy of the proposed method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据