4.7 Article

Investigation of high temperature effect on CFRP cutting mechanism based on a temperature controlled orthogonal cutting experiment

期刊

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
卷 268, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113967

关键词

Cutting temperature; CFRP drilling; Cutting mechanism; Thermal mechanical damages

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51705426]
  2. National Key Research and Development Project [2018YFB1703102]
  3. National Basic Scientific Research Program of China
  4. NDSRC [JCKY2019205B002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that heat accumulation during thick CFRP drilling may result in severe damages, but the specific cutting mechanism is still unclear.
CFRP has been gradually used in the load-carrying structure with thicker component and stricter damage tolerance in aviation industry. However, the heat accumulation always occurs at hole exit-ply during thick CFRP drilling, resulting in temperature even higher than the glass transition temperature (Tg) of matrix, affected by which severe damages will occur based on an unknown cutting mechanism. Therefore, to investigate the new mechanism, this paper proposed a temperature controlled orthogonal cutting experiment by heating the cutting area to specified high temperature ranges (below and above Tg) before cutting. The results show that the resin matrix will be only softened by the high temperature below Tg and lose part of its strength, but the cutting mechanism is almost not changed. As for temperature above Tg, the resin matrix will be heated into molten state thereby losing the support function for machined fibers, which changes the cutting mechanism at 90 degrees <9 < 180 degrees into low efficiency cutting mode controlled by compressing stress. The fibers that lose support will be over bent and broken by flank face, and severe thermal mechanical damages including loose face, matrix cracking and fiber pull out can be captured at 9 - 150 degrees of hole wall near exit.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据