4.7 Article

Highly efficient antibacterial activity of graphene/chitosan/magnetite nanocomposites against ESBL-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.111690

关键词

Hydrothermal synthesis; Graphene; Chitosan; Magnetite; Nanocomposites; Antibacterial activity

资金

  1. ANID-FONDECYT (Chile) [3180128]
  2. ANID-FONDEQUIP Grant [EQM130149]
  3. Millennium Science Initiative of ANID [NCN17_092]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated chitosan-containing nanocomposites as new antibacterial agents, including magnetite nanoparticles and graphene/CS/Fe3O4 NCs. The Gr/CS/Fe3O4 NCs showed significantly higher antibacterial activity against P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae compared to Fe3O4 NPs and CS/Fe3O4 NCs. The synergistic antibacterial activity and easy synthesis of Gr/CS/Fe3O4 NCs suggest their potential for various biomedical applications.
In the present study, chitosan-containing nanocomposites were investigated as new antibacterial agents. Magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles (NPs) as well as chitosan (CS)/Fe3O4 nanocomposites (NCs) and graphene(Gr)/ CS/Fe3O4 NCs were synthesized by simple hydrothermal method. Their composition, structure and morphology were studied, followed by the evaluation of their antibacterial activity against ESBL-producing and gramnegative P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae bacterial strains. The Gr/CS/Fe3O4 NCs showed significantly higher antibacterial activity compared to Fe3O4 NPs and CS/Fe3O4 NCs (105 and 69 % higher against P. aeruginosa as well as 91 and 77 % higher against K. pneumoniae, respectively). The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of Gr/CS/Fe3O4 NCs against P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae were 60 and 70 mu g/mL, respectively. The synergistic antibacterial activity and facile synthesis of Gr/CS/Fe3O4 NCs suggests their applicability as novel highly efficient antibacterial agents with potential for a wide range of biomedical applications, where antibacterial properties are needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据