4.6 Article

Novel Schiff base-based cationic Gemini surfactants as corrosion inhibitors for Q235 carbon steel and printed circuit boards

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.126717

关键词

Gemini surfactants; Schiff base; Carbon steel; Corrosion inhibition; Surface protection; Surface analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21676057]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Advanced Chemical Engineering Manufacture Technology [ACEMT-17-02]
  3. '111' program of Fuzhou University and Talent program of Fuzhou University [GXRC-18041]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The synthesized novel Gemini surfactants exhibit excellent anti-corrosion effects with high inhibition efficiency for metal corrosion, showing limitations in their corrosion inhibition for certain metals. Experimental results demonstrate that these surfactants are effective inhibitors for metal corrosion.
Surfactants play an essential role in the field of metal corrosion inhibition by adsorption. In this work, novel Schiff base-based cationic Gemini surfactants were synthesized, purified, and characterized, which particular chemical structures benefit to adsorbing on the metal surface and thus restricting metal corrosion. The corrosion inhibiting mechanism of the synthesized surfactants was researched by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, potentiodynamic polarization, and weight loss measurements. It was found that the surfactants behave as mixed-type inhibitors, and the adsorption follows Langmuir isotherm. SG-16 presents the best anti-corrosion effect; its corrosion inhibition efficiency reaches 93.5% for Q235 carbon steel and 83.38% for printed circuit boards. Scanning electron microscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy were applied to investigate the sample's surface morphology, which showed that there were surfactants, oxide, and very few corrosion traces on the sample's surface. These experimental results show that the novel Gemini surfactants are efficient corrosion inhibitors for metal.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据