4.6 Article

Systematical investigation on the solar-thermal conversion performance of TiN plasmonic nanofluids for the direct absorption solar collectors

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.126837

关键词

Solar energy; TiN plasmonic nanofluid; Direct solar absorption collector; Photothermal conversion efficiency

资金

  1. Chengdu University of Technology [10912-2019KYQD-07545]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

TiN nanofluids, with excellent optical properties and thermal conductivity, show promise and potential in increasing solar energy utilization efficiency in photothermal conversion applications.
The research on the efficient utilization of solar energy has far-reaching significance. Meanwhile, the preparation of high-efficiency, low-cost nanofluids as the working fluid in the photothermal conversion system is the current research hotspot. Herein, TiN is introduced as a plasmonic nanoparticle with excellent optical absorption and photothermal conversion properties. In our work, the optical absorption properties of TiN nanoparticles (NPs) were compared with those of Au, Ag and Cu nanoparticles by FDTD method. The results showed that the TiN NPs could be used as a potential photothermal material because of its good optical properties and lower cost. In addition, TiN nanofluids (10-50 ppm) based on ethylene glycol were prepared by a two-step method, which were well dispersed. The optical properties and thermal conductivity of TiN nanofluids were also measured and discussed, because of its plasmon resonance effect, the absorption characteristics and thermal conductivity of TiN nanofluids have been greatly improved. The solar-thermal conversion experiments were carried out by simulated light source in a direct absorption solar collector (DASC), and the efficiency of TiN nanofluid was maximum increased by 67.1% compared with the based liquid glycol ethanol. These findings therefore suggested that TiN nanofluids have promise and potential in photothermal conversion applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据