4.7 Review

Biological effect of PM10 on airway epithelium-focus on obstructive lung diseases

期刊

CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 227, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clim.2021.108754

关键词

PM10; Asthma; COPD; Epithelium; Oxidative stress; Innate immunity; Inflammation

资金

  1. European Social Fund [POWR.03.02.00-00-I041/16-00]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite ongoing efforts to reduce air pollutant emissions, environmental pollution continues to increase, particularly impacting respiratory diseases due to exposure to elevated levels of airborne particles. PM10, the largest fraction of air pollutants, contains various harmful components that can disrupt natural airway defense mechanisms and promote respiratory issues. This review highlights the importance of understanding the physical features of PM10 and its impact on airway epithelial cells and obstructive pulmonary diseases.
Recently, a continuous increase in environmental pollution has been observed. Despite wide-scale efforts to reduce air pollutant emissions, the problem is still relevant. Exposure to elevated levels of airborne particles increased the incidence of respiratory diseases. PM10 constitute the largest fraction of air pollutants, containing particles with a diameter of less than 10 mu m, metals, pollens, mineral dust and remnant material from anthropogenic activity. The natural airway defensive mechanisms against inhaled material, such as mucus layer, ciliary clearance and macrophage phagocytic activity, may be insufficient for proper respiratory function. The epithelium layer can be disrupted by ongoing oxidative stress and inflammatory processes induced by exposure to large amounts of inhaled particles as well as promote the development and exacerbation of obstructive lung diseases. This review draws attention to the current state of knowledge about the physical features of PM10 and its impact on airway epithelial cells, and obstructive pulmonary diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据