4.5 Review

Lysosomal storage disorders as an etiology of nonimmune hydrops fetalis: A systematic review

期刊

CLINICAL GENETICS
卷 100, 期 5, 页码 493-503

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cge.14005

关键词

hydrops fetalis; lysosomal storage diseases; lysosomal storage disorders; nonimmune hydrops fetalis; prenatal diagnosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that the incidence of lysosomal storage disorders in cases of nonimmune hydrops fetalis was 6.6% overall and 8.2% in idiopathic cases. The most common LSDs identified were mucopolysaccharidosis type VII, galactosialidosis, infantile sialic acid storage disease, Gaucher disease, GM1 gangliosidosis, and sialidosis. Over 40% of these LSDs have potential postnatal treatment options, highlighting the importance of early diagnosis and appropriate management.
We performed a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the incidence and types of lysosomal storage disorders (LSD) in case series of nonimmune hydrops fetalis (NIHF). PubMed, Ovid, and clinicaltrials.gov were reviewed for case series evaluating the workup of NIHF diagnosed in utero or in the neonatal period in human subjects from 1979 to August 2020. Retrospective case series with at least five cases of fetal and/or neonatal NIHF with its workup mentioned were identified. Idiopathic NIHF was defined as NIHF without an apparent cause after initial standard-of-care workup. In total, 22 case series with 2678 total cases of NIHF were identified. The overall incidence of LSD was 6.6% (177/2663) in NIHF cases that were tested for any LSD, and 8.2% (177/2151) in idiopathic NIHF cases. The most common LSD identified in cases of NIHF were mucopolysaccharidosis type VII, galactosialidosis, infantile sialic acid storage disease, Gaucher disease, GM1 gangliosidosis, and sialidosis. More than 40% of the most common LSD causes of NIHF have a potential postnatal treatment. LSD testing for NIHF allows for early diagnosis, better counseling and appropriate management, planning for possible early treatment, and counseling for recurrence risk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据