4.2 Article

Prognostic Value and Molecular Landscape of HER2 Low-Expressing Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

期刊

CLINICAL COLORECTAL CANCER
卷 20, 期 2, 页码 113-+

出版社

CIG MEDIA GROUP, LP
DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2020.11.002

关键词

Colorectal cancer; HER2 low-expressing; Heterogeneity; Prognosis; RAS mutation

类别

资金

  1. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) [JP18lk0201084]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluated the prognostic value and molecular landscape of HER2-L metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and found that HER2-L mCRC has a better prognosis compared to HER2-Pos mCRC. It suggests the potential of HER2-guided clinical development against HER2-expressing mCRC due to the different biological behavior of HER2-L mCRC.
We evaluated the prognostic value and molecular landscape of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) low-expressing (HER2-L) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). HER2-L mCRC showed a better prognosis than HER2-positive mCRC. HER2-L mCRC might have a different biologic behavior in terms of prognostic value and molecular landscape of mCRC, suggesting a clinical implementation of HER2-guided clinical development against HER2-expressing mCRC. Background: The prognostic value and molecular landscape of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) low-expressing (HER2-L) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remain unclear. Patients and Methods: This study enrolled patients with mCRC who had undergone surgical resection of primary tumor. Using the specimen, we evaluated HER2 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). HER2 positivity was defined as follows: HER2 positivity (HER2-Pos) as IHC 3 + or IHC 2 +/FISH positive, HER2-L as IHC 2+/ FISH negative or IHC 1 +, and HER2 negativity (HER2-Neg) as IHC 0+. Gene alterations were determined by next-generation sequencing. Results: Between 2005 and 2015, a total of 370 patients were analyzed, comprising 15 patients (4%) with HER2-Pos, 21 (6%) with HER2-L, and 334 (90%) with HER2-Neg disease. The clinicopathologic characteristics among groups had no differences. HER2-L had a significantly higher proportion of coaltered RAS mutation than HER2-Pos (P = .037). With a median follow-up of 101.8 months, HER2-L had a significantly better median overall survival than HER2-Pos (P = .029) (18.2 months in HER2-Pos vs. 33.3 in HER2-L vs. 27.9 in HER2-Neg). In 58 patients harboring wild-type RAS and receiving anti-EGFR antibody therapy, HER2-L had a better median progression-free survival tendency than HER2-Pos, with 2.2 months in HER2-Pos, 7.8 in HER2-L, and 5.1 in HER2-Neg (P = .036). Conclusion: HER2-L mCRC showed a better prognosis than HER2-Pos mCRC, and it is similar to HER2-Neg mCRC. Hence, HER2-L mCRC might have different biologic behavior in terms of prognostic value and molecular landscape of mCRC, suggesting the possibility of implementation of HER2-guided clinical development against HER2-expressing mCRC. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据