4.5 Review

Dermatological surgery: an update on suture materials and techniques. Part 1

期刊

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY
卷 46, 期 8, 页码 1400-1410

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ced.14770

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is significant variability in surgical suture materials and techniques used for dermatological surgery, but limited evidence specific to this area. Absorbable superficial sutures may be a preferable alternative, with subcuticular sutures and skin staples also potentially useful in certain situations. Further high-quality research, including multicentre randomized trials, is needed to better understand the optimal suture materials and techniques for dermatological surgery.
Significant variation exists in the surgical suture materials and techniques used for dermatological surgery. Many wound-closure techniques are now practised, including use of sutures, staples and topical adhesives. The focus of our review article is to summarize the latest evidence relating to suture materials and wound-closure techniques, considering the following areas: scar/cosmesis, pain, patient satisfaction, cost, infection and wound complications. We searched the databases Medline, PubMed and Embase using the keywords 'skin surgery', 'dermatologic surgery', 'sutures', 'suture techniques', 'suturing techniques' and 'surgical techniques' to identify relevant English-language articles. Absorbable superficial sutures may be a preferred alternative to nonabsorbable sutures by both patients and surgeons. Subcuticular sutures may be preferable to simple interrupted sutures for superficial wound closure, and there may also be a role for skin staples in dermatological surgery, particularly on the scalp. However, there remains limited evidence specific to dermatological surgery supporting the use of particular suture materials and suturing techniques. Further high-quality research is required, including multicentre randomized trials with larger cohorts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据