4.3 Review

A narrative review and clinical anatomy of herpes zoster infection following COVID-19 vaccination

期刊

CLINICAL ANATOMY
卷 35, 期 1, 页码 45-51

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ca.23790

关键词

clinical anatomy; complications; COVID-19; infection; oral herpes zoster; palate; pandemic; reactivation; vaccination; varicella zoster virus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review analyzed cases of herpes zoster (HZ) infection following COVID-19 vaccine administration, including two cases of oral HZ. A total of 399 cases were identified, showing dermatomes mimicking the regular distribution pattern of HZ. Some patients with a history of varicella zoster virus vaccination also developed HZ following COVID-19 vaccination.
Introduction In this review, cases of herpes zoster (HZ) infection following receipt of COVID-19 vaccines will be analyzed. We also present two cases of oral HZ following the COVID-19 vaccine and discuss this clinical anatomy. Materials and Methods A database search using PubMed was conducted in August 2021 and 20 articles were found to be eligible for review. Patient data and vaccine information were analyzed. In addition, two cases of oral HZ infection following the receipt of COVID-19 vaccines are presented. Results A total of 399 cases were identified. The affected dermatomes mimicked the regular distribution of HZ. For the dermatomes of the face, the various reports used different ways to describe the areas involved; CNV, CNV1, CNV2, CNV3, lower jaw, forehead, and under the eyebrow (CNV, 2 cases; CNV1, 4 cases; CNV2, 3 cases; and CNV3, 3 cases). Some patients who had a history of varicella zoster virus vaccination had HZ following the COVID-19 vaccination. Two patients with oral HZ following vaccination were found to have involvement of the greater palatine nerve. Conclusions Vaccine-related HZ cases have been reported worldwide. Although many studies with a larger number of cases are ongoing, detailed information can be obtained from case reviews as reported herein.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据