4.5 Article

High Performance Electrospun Polynaphthalimide Nanofibrous Membranes with Excellent Resistance to Chemically Harsh Conditions

期刊

CHINESE JOURNAL OF POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 39, 期 12, 页码 1634-1644

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10118-021-2634-8

关键词

Polynaphthalimide; Nanofibrous membrane; Strong acid; Strong base; Salt

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21975111, 21774053, 51803093]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20180770]
  3. Open Project of Chemistry Department of Qingdao University of Science and Technology [QUSTHX201921]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Utilizing a template strategy, nanofiber (6)-PI membranes with better chemical resistance were successfully fabricated, showing excellent thermal stability, acid, alkaline, and salt resistance, as well as high mechanical retention.
Polynaphthalimide (PNI) with six-membered imide ring ((6)-PI) has better chemical resistance than five-membered imide ring ((5)-PI), but is difficult to be processed into nanofibers due to the poor processability. In this work, we proposed a template strategy to fabricate nanofiber (6)-PI membranes and their composite membranes. Neat (6)-PI and (6)-PI composite fibrous membranes were prepared using high-molecular-weight polymers (5)-PAA and PVP as templates by electrospinning. FTIR, DMA, TGA and tensile tests were used to characterize their chemical structures, thermal stability and mechanical properties. Further eye-observation, micro-morphology investigation and tensile tests were applied to evaluate the chemical resistance of nanofibrous membranes in strong acid, strong alkaline, and concentrated salt. The results demonstrated that (6)-PI nanofibrous membranes possessed the best thermal stability, best acid, alkaline, and salt resistance with the highest mechanical retention. This study will provide basic information for high-performance electrospun (6)-PI nanofiber membranes and provide opportunities for applications of PIs in different chemically harsh environments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据