4.5 Article

Dendrimer-based Hydrogels with Controlled Drug Delivery Property for Tissue Adhesion

期刊

CHINESE JOURNAL OF POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 39, 期 11, 页码 1421-1430

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10118-021-2584-1

关键词

Hydrogel adhesive; Dendrimer; pH-Responsive; Drug delivery; Tissue adhesion

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2020YFA0908900]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21935011, 51973226, 21725403, 81871782]
  3. Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS [2019031]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study successfully developed a POSS-ace-PEG hydrogel adhesive with good mechanical and adhesive properties, and demonstrated different stability and release characteristics in various acid-base environments, showing potential for applications in pathological environments.
In recent years, the hydrogel-based tissue adhesives have been extensively investigated for their excellent biocompatibility and the ability to be administered directly within the adherent tissue. To meet the requirement for more controllable release in various physiological settings, the components of hydrogel adhesive should be more precisely tailored. In this work, the POSS-ace-PEG hydrogel adhesive was fabricated with the polyacetal dendrimer G1'-[NH3Cl](16) and poly(ethylene glycol) succinimidyl carbonate (PEG-SC) due to the regular peripheral amino structure of G1'[NH3Cl](16). Rheological and adhesion tests demonstrated that the hydrogel adhesive had good mechanical and adhesive properties, which could effectively adhere to the pigskin and severed nerves. Moreover, the tissue adhesive exhibited good stability under neutral conditions and the rapid degradation under acidic conditions, allowing for the release of doxycycline hydrochloride (DOX) drug in response to pH. Together, these results suggested that the POSS-ace-PEG adhesive had the potential to provide an alternative to tissue adhesives for applications in pathological environments (inflammation, tumors, etc.).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据