4.6 Article

An Intelligent Fault Diagnosis Method of Multi-Scale Deep Feature Fusion Based on Information Entropy

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1186/s10033-021-00580-5

关键词

Fault diagnosis; Feature fusion; Information entropy; Deep autoencoder; Deep belief network

资金

  1. Key Project of Tianjin Science and Technology Support Program [16YFZCSY00860]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1733108]
  3. Civil Aviation Administration of China [U1733108]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a multi-scale deep feature fusion intelligent fault diagnosis method based on information entropy, using a variety of autoencoders to construct a deep neural network feature extraction structure and employing deep belief network probability model as the fault classifier. Experimental results show that compared to traditional methods, this approach obtains higher accuracy features from raw data.
For a single-structure deep learning fault diagnosis model, its disadvantages are an insufficient feature extraction and weak fault classification capability. This paper proposes a multi-scale deep feature fusion intelligent fault diagnosis method based on information entropy. First, a normal autoencoder, denoising autoencoder, sparse autoencoder, and contractive autoencoder are used in parallel to construct a multi-scale deep neural network feature extraction structure. A deep feature fusion strategy based on information entropy is proposed to obtain low-dimensional features and ensure the robustness of the model and the quality of deep features. Finally, the advantage of the deep belief network probability model is used as the fault classifier to identify the faults. The effectiveness of the proposed method was verified by a gearbox test-bed. Experimental results show that, compared with traditional and existing intelligent fault diagnosis methods, the proposed method can obtain representative information and features from the raw data with higher classification accuracy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据