4.5 Article

Prediction of Multicomponent Reaction Yields Using Machine Learning

期刊

CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
卷 39, 期 12, 页码 3231-3237

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cjoc.202100434

关键词

Machine learning; Yield prediction; Radical reactions; Density functional calculations; Multicomponent reactions

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21775107, 21822108]
  2. Sichuan Science and Technology Program [20CXTD0112]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Machine learning can help chemists predict reaction yields and select high-yielding reactions to improve experimental efficiency. The study demonstrated the potential of regression modeling in predicting yields for a multicomponent organic reaction, showing improved performance and application potential of the model.
Main observation and conclusion Prediction of reaction yields using machine learning (ML) can help chemists select high-yielding reactions and provide prior experience before wet-lab experimenting to improve efficiency. However, the exploration of a multicomponent organic reaction features many complex variables and limited number of experimental data, which are challenging for the application of ML. Herein, we perform yield prediction for the synthesis of 2-oxazolidones via Cu-catalyzed radical-type oxy-alkylation of allylamines and herteroarylmethylamines with CO2, which is a three-component reaction. Using physicochemical descriptors as features to launch ML modelling, we find that XGBoost shows significantly improved performance over linear models and these features are effective for the yield prediction. Moreover, out-of-sample prediction indicates the application potential of the model. This study demonstrates great potential of regression-modelling-based ML in organic synthesis even with complex factors and a general small size of reaction data, which are generated from the classical research pattern of method for the inquiry of multicomponent reactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据