4.7 Article

Enhanced photocatalytic CO2 hydrogenation with wide-spectrum utilization over black TiO2 supported catalyst

期刊

CHINESE CHEMICAL LETTERS
卷 33, 期 2, 页码 812-816

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.07.046

关键词

Photothermal; Black TiO2; CO2; Electron-rich; Hydrogenation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21978170]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFC0506004]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [19ZR1424800]
  4. Center of Hydrogen Science, Shanghai Jiao Tong University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The combination of light and heat in photothermal catalysis enables efficient conversion of CO2 into methane. By increasing the catalyst surface temperature and providing more negative ions, the methane yield can be significantly improved.
Light-driven conversion of CO2 into chemicals/fuels is a desirable approach for achieving carbon neutrality using clean and sustainable energy. However, its scale-up application is restricted due to insufficient efficiency. Herein, we present a photothermal catalytic hydrogenation of CO2 into CH4 over Ru/black TiO2 catalysts, aiming to achieve the synergistic use of light and heat in solar energy during CO2 conversion. Owing to the desirable spectral response ability and photothermal conversion performance of black TiO2, an efficient combination of photocatalysis and thermocatalysis has been established. The CO2 hydrogenation was significantly accelerated because of the increased catalyst surface temperature enabled by the photothermal effect of black TiO2. Simultaneously, through the in situ X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) observation, electron-rich Ru nanoparticles was achieved based on the photo-induced excitation, thereby providing more negative hydride to improve nucleophilic attack to the CO2, obtaining the CH4 yield of 93.8%. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Chinese Chemical Society and Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据