4.7 Article

Nitrogen and boron co-doped graphene nanoribbons as peroxidase-mimicking nanozymes for enhanced biosensing

期刊

CHINESE CHEMICAL LETTERS
卷 33, 期 1, 页码 344-348

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.06.018

关键词

Graphene nanoribbons; Heteroatom doping; Nanozymes; Biosensing; Interleukin-6

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundations of China [21605062, 21974055]
  2. Top-notch Academic Programs Project of Jiangsu Higher Education Institution (TAPP)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The nitrogen and boron co-doped graphene nanoribbons (NB-GNRs) prepared by a hydrothermal method exhibit superior peroxidase-like activities, enabling the development of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of interleukin-6. The biosensors based on NB-GNRs show a wide linear range and a low detection limit, indicating great potential in various applications.
The rational design of nanozymes with superior activities is essential for improving bioassay performances. Herein, nitrogen and boron co-doped graphene nanoribbons (NB-GNRs) are prepared by a hydrothermal method using urea as the nitrogen source and boric acid as the boron source, respectively. The introduction of co-doped and edge structures provides high defects and active sites. The resultant NB-GNRs nanozymes show superior peroxidase-like activities to nitrogen-doped and boron-doped counterparts due to the synergistic effects. By taking advantage of their peroxidase-like activities, NB-GNRs are used for the first time to develop enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of interleukin-6. The biosensors exhibit a high performance with a linear range from 0.001 ng/mL to 1000 ng/mL and a detection limit of 0.3 pg/mL. Due to their low cost and high stability, the proposed nanomaterials show great promise in biocatalysis, immunoassay development and environmental monitoring. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Chinese Chemical Society and Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据