4.8 Article

Catalytic Hydrogenolysis of Lignin: The Influence of Minor Units and Saccharides

期刊

CHEMSUSCHEM
卷 14, 期 23, 页码 5186-5198

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cssc.202101527

关键词

2D HSQC NMR; biomass; lignocellulose; residual enzyme lignin; reductive fractionation

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council [201706300138]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the differences in lignin structure from different plant materials and found that lignin structure has an impact on product yield and distribution, with NMR analysis correlating with hydrogenolysis products. Moreover, residual polysaccharide constituents were found to influence the selectivity towards hydroxy-containing monomers, emphasizing the importance of structural characterization and compositional analysis of starting materials.
The precise elucidation of native lignin structures plays a vital role for the development of lignin first strategies such as reductive catalytic fractionation. The structure of lignin and composition of the starting material has a major impact on the product yield and distribution. Here, the differences in structure of lignin from birch, pine, reed, and walnut shell were investigated by combining detailed analysis of the whole cell wall material, residual enzyme lignin, and milled wood lignin. The results of the 2D heteronuclear single quantum coherence NMR analysis could be correlated to the product from Ru/C-catalyzed hydrogenolysis if monomeric products from ferulate and p-coumaryl and its analogous units were also appropriately considered. Notably, residual polysaccharide constituents seemed to influence the selectivity towards hydroxy-containing monomers. The results reinforced the importance of adequate structural characterization and compositional analysis of the starting materials as well as distinct (dis)advantages of specific types of structural characterization and isolation methods for guiding valorization potential of different biomass feedstocks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据