4.8 Article

Water in Protic Ionic Liquid Electrolytes: From Solvent Separated Ion Pairs to Water Clusters

期刊

CHEMSUSCHEM
卷 14, 期 16, 页码 3315-3324

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cssc.202100660

关键词

molecular dynamics; ionic liquids; water-in-salt; hydrogen bonds; electrolytes

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft under the SPP 1708 project [KI768/15-1]
  2. BMBF under the LuCaMag project [03EK3051A]
  3. Projekt DEAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that at very low concentrations, water is well dispersed and best characterized as shared solvent molecules; at higher concentrations, water forms larger aggregates and increasingly approaches a bulk-like state; the rotational and librational dynamics of water molecules become faster with increasing concentration, while translational dynamics become slower, and all dynamics are faster with higher temperature.
The large electrochemical and cycling stability of water-in-salt systems have rendered promising prospective electrolytes for batteries. The impact of addition of water on the properties of ionic liquids has already been addressed in several publications. In this contribution, we focus on the changes in the state of water. Therefore, we investigated the protic ionic liquid N-butyl-pyrrolidinium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide with varying water content at different temperatures with the aid of molecular dynamics simulations. It is revealed that at very low concentrations, the water is well dispersed and best characterized as shared solvent molecules. At higher concentrations, the water forms larger aggregates and is increasingly approaching a bulk-like state. While the librational and rotational dynamics of the water molecules become faster with increasing concentration, the translational dynamics are found to become slower. Further, all dynamics are found to be faster if the temperature increases. The trends of these findings are well in line with the experimental measured conductivities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据