4.7 Article

Inductive effects in cobalt-doped nickel hydroxide electronic structure facilitating urea electrooxidation

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 279, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130550

关键词

Urea oxidation reaction; Electronic structure; Nickel-cobalt hydroxide; Electrocatalysis; DFT; Sol-gel

资金

  1. University of Waterloo
  2. Waterloo Institute for Nanotechnology
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  4. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  5. Ontario Research Fund
  6. University of Guelph
  7. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research of Council of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By adjusting the Ni:Co ratio, we can control the intrinsic activity and number of active surface sites, thereby enhancing UOR performance.
Electrochemical oxidation of urea provides an approach to prevent excess urea emissions into the environment while generating value by capturing chemical energy from waste. Unfortunately, the source of high catalytic activity in state-of-the-art doped nickel catalysts for urea oxidation reaction (UOR) activity remains poorly understood, hindering the rational design of new catalyst materials. In particular, the exact role of cobalt as a dopant in Ni(OH)(2) to maximize the intrinsic activity towards UOR remains unclear. In this work, we demonstrate how tuning the Ni:Co ratio allows us to control the intrinsic activity and number of active surface sites, both of which contribute towards increasing UOR performance. We show how Ni90Co10(OH)(2) achieves the largest geometric current density due to the increase of available surface sites and that intrinsic activity towards UOR is maximized with Ni20Co80(OH)(2). Through density functional theory calculations, we show that the introduction of Co alters the Ni 3d electronic state density distribution to lower the minimum energy required to oxidize Ni and influence potential surface adsorbate interactions. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据