4.7 Article

Regional occurrence of perfluoroalkane substances in human milk for the global monitoring plan under the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants during 2016-2019

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 277, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130287

关键词

Human biomonitoring; Perfluorinated alkane substances (PFAS); WHO/UNEP protocol; LC/MS-MS analysis

资金

  1. Global Environment Facility (GEF) [GEF GMP2 GF4030]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study analyzed human milk samples from 44 primiparae in 42 countries, showing significant differences in concentrations of PFOA and PFOS, with higher levels of PFOA in wealthier countries. No correlation was found for population density.
The human milk monitoring component of the global monitoring plan under the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants was implemented from 2016 to 2019 and had 44 human milk samples from primiparae collected in 42 countries and analyzed for perfluoroalkane substances (PFAS), at the MTM Research Centre at Orebro University, Sweden. The targeted compounds were restricted to the two listed PFAS (perfluorooctane sulfonic acid, PFOS and perfluorooctane carboxylic acid, PFOA) and the one recommended PFAS (perfluorohexane sulfonic acid, PFHxS). PFOA was quantified in all 44 samples in a quite narrow range (6.20 pg/g-37.4 pg/g); PFHxS was quantifiable in only four samples (max. 111 pg/g), and PFOS in 36 samples across a wide range (<6.2 pg/g-212 pg/g). Branched PFOS isomers on average had a share of 16% of the total PFOS with a maximum of 33%. PFOS was highly correlated with PFHxS (Pearson correlation coefficient R = 0.95) and weakly but still positively with PFOA (R = 0.44). Statistical analysis (all on p<0.05) showed that PFOS and PFOA in European countries were significantly different from those in African and Latin American countries and between high-income and low-income countries. PFOA tends to have higher concentrations in wealthier countries. No correlation was found for population density. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据