4.7 Article

Facile synthesis of Pt-Ce0.63Zr0.37O2-Y catalysts and the application in catalytic oxidation of toluene

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 276, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130207

关键词

Cerium-zirconium solid solution; Platinum; Catalytic oxidation; Y zeolite; Toluene

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22078177, 21776164]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of Pt-Ce0.63Zr0.37O2-Y catalysts were prepared by a unique simple mechanical mixing method, and their catalytic performance in toluene oxidation was investigated. Mixing cerium zirconium solid solution with Pt-NaY improved the catalytic properties, leading to high conversion rates and catalytic stability. The catalysts showed promising potential for practical applications in toluene oxidation reactions.
In this work, a series of Pt-Ce0.63Zr0.37O2-Y catalysts were prepared by unique simple mechanical mixing method. The catalytic activity of these catalysts for toluene oxidation was investigated. The physicochemical properties of the catalysts were characterized by XRD, ICP-MS, SEM, TEM, XPS and N-2 sorption. Pore size distribution was analyzed according nitrogen adsorption and desorption isotherms. The catalytic results showed that using NaY as support for PteCe(0.63)Zr(0.37)O(2)-Y could enhance the conversion of toluene during the oxidation process in comparison with HY. Further mixing cerium zirconium solid solution with Pt-NaY can improve the oxidation catalytic property of these catalysts. The conversion of toluene over Pt-Ce0.63Zr0.37O2-NaY reached more than 90% at 200 degrees C. High catalytic stability was obtained for toluene oxidation over Pt-Ce0.63Zr0.37O2-NaY. Platinum, cerium and zirconium can be uniformly dispersed on Y zeolite with small particle size by simple mechanical synthesis. The effect of drying methods on catalytic activity and hydrothermal stability of catalysts were also investigated in this research. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据