4.6 Article

Janus All-Cis 2,3,4,5,6-Pentafluorocyclohexyl Building Blocks Applied to Medicinal Chemistry and Bioactives Discovery Chemistry

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 27, 期 64, 页码 16000-16005

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.202102819

关键词

aryl hydrogenation; fluorocyclohexanes; Janus motif; organic chemistry; organofluorine chemistry

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/R013799/1]
  2. EPSRC CRITICAT CDT programme
  3. Chinese Scholarship Council
  4. EPSRC [EP/R013799/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces monoalkylated derivatives containing the polar all-cis 2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorocyclohexyl (Janus face) motif, and demonstrates their conversion to various compounds, including representative members of antiviral compounds.
Monoalkylated derivatives of the unusually polar all-cis 2,3,4,5,6- pentafluorocyclohexyl (Janus face) motif are prepared starting from an aryl hydrogenation of 2,3,4,5,6- pentafluorophenylacetate methyl ester 15. The method used Zeng's Rh(CAAC) carbene catalyst 4 in the hydrogenation following the protocol developed by Glorius. The resultant Janus pentafluorocyclohexylacetate methyl ester 16 was converted to the corresponding alcohol 18, aldehyde 13, bromide 29 and azide 14 through functional group manipulations, and some of these building blocks were used in Ugi-multicomponent and Cu-catalysed click reactions. NBoc protected pentafluoroarylphenylalanine methyl ester 35 was also subject to an aryl hydrogenation, and then deprotection to generate the Janus face beta-pentafluorocyclohexyl-alanine amino acid 15, which was incorporated into representative members of an emerging class of candidate antiviral compounds. Log P measurements demonstrate that the all-cis 2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorocyclohexyl ring system is more polar than a phenyl ring. In overview the paper introduces new building blocks containing this Janus ring and demonstrates their progression to molecules typically used in bioactives discovery programmes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据