4.6 Article

Trinuclear Cyanido-Bridged [Cr2Fe] Complexes: To Be or not to Be a Single-Molecule Magnet, a Matter of Straightness

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 27, 期 62, 页码 15484-15495

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.202102571

关键词

ab initio calculations; anisotropy; magnetism; pentagonal bipyramid; single-molecule magnets

资金

  1. French National Research Agency, ANR [ANR-17-CE07-0007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Trinuclear metal complexes were synthesized to investigate their influence on the magnetic anisotropy of Fe-II derivatives and their Single-Molecule Magnet behaviors, revealing a significant effect of the bending of M-N to C linkages on the slow relaxation of magnetization in [Cr2Fe] complexes. Theoretical calculations emphasized the importance of apical C-N-Fe linkages on the magnetic anisotropy and exchange interactions in these complexes.
Trinuclear systems of formula [{Cr(L-N3O2Ph)(CN)(2)}(2)M(H2LN3O2R)] (M=Mn-II and Fe-II, L-N3O2R stands for pentadentate ligands) were prepared in order to assess the influence of the bending of the apical M-N equivalent to C linkages on the magnetic anisotropy of the Fe-II derivatives and in turn on their Single-Molecule Magnet (SMM) behaviors. The cyanido-bridged [Cr2M] derivatives were obtained by assembling trans-dicyanido Cr-III complex [Cr(L-N3O2Ph)(CN)(2)](-) and divalent pentagonal bipyramid complexes [M-II(H2LN3O2R)](2+) with various R substituents (R=NH2, cyclohexyl, S,S-mandelic) imparting different steric demand to the central moiety of the complexes. A comparative examination of the structural and magnetic properties showed an obvious effect of the deviation from straightness of the M-N equivalent to C alignment on the slow relaxation of the magnetization exhibited by the [Cr2Fe] complexes. Theoretical calculations have highlighted important effects of the bending of the apical C-N-Fe linkages on both the magnetic anisotropy of the Fe-II center and the exchange interactions with the Cr-III units.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据